The real work starts after WCIT

The really important part of the World Conference on International Telecommunications 2012 (WCIT-12) is not the Internet battles that have caught the interest of the press – it’s what will happen after the conference has ended.

Membership of WCIT is on a per-country basis and currently 193 countries will be participating in this international event.

Each country is free to make up its own delegation and these delegations can therefore represent a large variety of social, economic, business, legal, technical and other interests – as large and as wide as each country decides its delegation will be.

The responsibility for organizing the WCIT rests with ITU, which is the oldest UN organization, founded in 1865.

The current media frenzy about the Internet and the false rumours that the UN or any other organization is going to take over its governance is just that – a media beat-up.

As in any international meeting, countries are welcome to bring their plans, proposals, opinions and views to the conference and to take the opportunity to present these to the international audience.

However proposals from the USA, Russia and China, the European or Arab regions are not automatically accepted simply because they are presented at the conference. That is not the case in any international conference – and certainly not at ITU, which has a reputation for consensus-building.

The media frenzy seems to be based on the incorrect assumption that any of the proposals that have been circulated or rumoured could be, or even will be, accepted.

It is true that some of these proposals and rumours contain elements that will be unacceptable to other members of the international community and vested interests involved in the debate have used the well-known FUD strategy (spread fear, uncertainty and doubt) to fuel the media frenzy.

On the positive side, the interest in WCIT-12 has now moved well beyond the traditional ICT industry.

It has gained an enormous amount of attention and has brought the Internet governance issue to the notice of mainstream society. This, of course, is a positive development and it also indicates how important the Internet has become for everybody, with non-technical people starting to take a serious interest in its future.

One of the problems of the Internet has been that, while it has been growing into that wider context, the governing bodies have not kept up with the growth of these wider interests and concerns. There is now a range of social and economic issues, as well as the technical issues that need to be addressed.

In the current debate however, all these issues have been thrown into one pool.

Like it or not, this debate has brought a large number of important issues to the fore and they will need to be confronted. What the WCIT-12 has to do upfront, is untangle the various issues and clearly separate them from each other.

The next step will then be to clearly define what can be solved on a national level and what needs to be addressed internationally – and, if there are issues that need international attention, who are the best parties to address those issues.

The most important issue at the WCIT-12 will be how the international community will manage the current debate so as to move towards a manageable future.

Most likely what this will mean is that the various international stakeholders will have to create a (new) platform that can be used to address these issues.

In addition, existing Internet bodies such as ICANN, ISOC and IGF, as well as the UN and some of its organizations such as ITU and others, will all need to be part of this.

The Internet is there for all.

It is an enormous social and economic enabler and should be used to advance our global society. It clearly has the potential to do this and it is the responsibility of all involved to make that happen.

WCIT-12 has the enormous opportunity, as a representation of global society, to play a leadership role in guiding the future of the Internet for the benefit of all.

The new platform that should be the result of this, needs to be truly international, independent and it needs to be well-funded, so that it can properly address the issues at hand.

It is therefore, most unlikely that – apart from some of the purely technical matters – any of the more contentious issues that are being addressed in the press will be solved at WCIT-12. Nor should that be the case, because WCIT is probably the wrong place to address these issues.

Nevertheless WCIT-12 can be the catalyst and the facilitator to kick-start the process.

Paul Budde will participate in WCIT-12 and will report back to readers on its progress.

Paul Budde is the Managing Director of Paul Budde Communication Pty Limited, trading as BuddeComm ( an independent telecommunications research and consultancy organization. BuddeComm has 15 senior analysts and a large international network of researchers and telecoms experts.


  1. Mr Budde, how do you and the ITU propose to enact “global community standards” considering this has been the primary political issue with the Internet and is still unsolved (un-solveable imo).

    I really don’t think another UN committee is going to achieve a break-through on this.

    So if you can’t solve that political problem, what is left?

    Just another new committee that will probably start passing resolutions to justify its own existence.

    Mark me as a pessimist, but the ideas promoted to the ITU I’ve seen so far are deplorable.

  2. But Paul, the ITU has said WCIT is not about Internet Governance? Is it or isn’t it? The truth is we don’t know, because unlike the other organisations you cite, WCIT will be a secretive closed conference where only governments get a say and a vote.

  3. Michel Gauthier · ·

    You wrote “The Internet is there for all.”. This is half untrue. It is here for a few (Google and US interests) to make money on all. Why? Beause it is still technically host centric. To relate with others on the Internet I must us Google, Yahoo!, Facebook, Twitter, etc.’s computers. There are two say about the internet:
    – “the internet constitution is the source code”. IETF specifies it, mainly formed by US services and manufacturers Industry employees.
    – “If its free, YOU are the product”. We all are Google’s products.
    No, it is not true that the Internet is there for all.

    The response is easy and should come from you. It should be to launch an “ITU-I” sector, open to every Internet lead user (the people who know how to enhance the Internet to fit the people true needs). A simple mailing list to start with. Then :

    1. technical meet-ups all over the world. Then some innovation research and documentation sponsoring (this does not cost much). The sponsoring intertesting project ON-TOP of the technically neutral internet dumb bandwidth, for a smart services layer.

    2. a crash training – discussed with smart users (some of the people among users know about training and explaining) – to explain the internet to decision makers. So they know how to best protect us against Googles and UN bureaucacies, controlling that them and you make a good job.

    Dont forget please that we are paying for the Internet. Please help us and foster competition to see IPv6 to deploy. Take in charge a part of the IPv6 plan so it develops like your telephone did, while it is blocked for nearly 20 years by the “industry dominants” (IDs). We do not want you more than the IDs, we want to get rid of the IDs’ market monopoly.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: